Contact Us

With over 100 years of combined experience and a demonstrated track record in complex litigation, our diverse team is prepared to help. Briefly describe your issue below to get started.

Your Name
Email Address
Phone Number
Tell Us About
Your Legal Issue

Morgan Keegan Closed-End Income Funds Class Action Lawsuit

Pearson Simon & Warshaw, LLP and Labaton Sucharow LLP filed a class action lawsuit on May 19, 2010 in the U. S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee on behalf of all persons who purchased or otherwise acquired shares in the following closed-end mutual funds (collectively, "Funds") between June 6, 2005 and July 14, 2009:

RMK Advantage Income Fund ("RMA")
RMK Strategic Income Fund ("RSF")
RMK High Income Fund ("RMH")
RHY Multi-Sector High Income Fund ("RHY")

The complaint seeks damages under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and names as defendants Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc., Morgan Asset Management, Inc., Regions Financial Corp., RMK Advantage Income Fund, Inc., RMK Strategic Income Fund, Inc., RMK High Income Fund, Inc., RHY Multi-Sector High Income Fund, Inc., Carter E. Anthony, Allen B. Morgan, Jr., Joseph Weller, James Stillman R. Mcfadden, Archie W. Willis, III, Mary S. Stone, W. Randall Pittman, J. Kenneth Alderman, J. Thompson Weller, James C. Kelsoe, Jr., David H. Tannehill, Jack R. Blair, Albert C. Johnson, Charles D. Maxwell, and PricewaterhouseCoopers, L.L.P. (collectively, "Defendants").

The complaint alleges that Defendants concealed the Funds' investments in poor-quality, asset-backed securities ("ABS"), leveraged many times over by complex capital structures. Defendants affirmatively misrepresented that the securities it held in the Funds were corporate bonds and preferred stocks. Contrary to the Company's assertions that investors in the Funds suffered losses as a result of a "mortgage meltdown," the complaint alleges the Funds collapsed because they held concentrated holdings of low-priority tranches of ABS. Defendants did not fully or accurately inform investors in the Funds of the risks inherent in the subordinated ABS tranches until after some $1 billion in losses were incurred. Defendants also misled investors by repeatedly comparing the performance of the Funds to the Lehman Brothers Ba U.S. High-Yield Index, which contained only corporate bonds, wholly distinct from ABS. Defendants' conduct has prompted regulatory enforcement actions or investigations by at least five state regulators, FINRA, and the SEC.

If you would like a copy of the complaint, please click here.

If you would like to discuss this case with Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, please contact us.

Los Angeles:(818) 788-8300
San Francisco:(415) 433-9000
Minneapolis:(612) 389-0600

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Pearson, Simon & Warshaw, LLP

15165 Ventura Blvd., Suite 400
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 View Map
Phone: (818) 788-8300
555 Montgomery St., Suite 1205
San Francisco, CA 94111 View Map
Phone: (415) 433-9000
328 Barry Ave. S., Suite 200
Wayzata, MN 55391 View Map
Phone: (612) 389-0600

Website: © 2013 All Rights Reserved.